September 2024

Volume 41, Issue 3

The accuracy of parent/carer proxy-reporting of caries experience in children and association with socioeconomic circumstances: a cross-sectional data linkage study

Authors: Kyle Cousins David Conway Paul Bradshaw Andrea Sherriff
doi: 10.1922/CDH_00073Cousins06

Abstract

Objectives: To compare parent/carer proxy-reported dental caries experience of their 5-year-old child with epidemiological survey clinician examination of caries experience in the same children. To determine any differences in the accuracy by area-based socioeconomic group. Methods: A cross-sectional data linkage study linked data from the Growing Up in Scotland (GUS) study and the National Dental Inspection Programme (NDIP) school epidemiology survey. Parent/carer proxy-reported caries experience was compared with clinicianmeasured caries experience on n=3008 children, and data were stratified by home-residential area-based socioeconomic deprivation levels (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD)). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated overall and stratified by SIMD. Results: Overall, parent/carer proxy-reporting had low sensitivity (42.3% 95%CI: 39.0, 45.7) that decreased with decreasing deprivation (SIMD-1(most deprived): 49.4% to SIMD-5 (least deprived): 37.2%). Specificity remained consistently high overall and across area-based socioeconomic deprivation levels (overall=96.2%, 95%CI: 95.3, 97.0; SIMD-1: 94.4% SIMD-5: 97.8%). In children whose parents/carers reported them to have caries experience (GUS) a high percentage were found to have caries experience (NDIP) (PPV=81.8%, 95%CI: 78.2, 84.9). Conclusion: Parent/carer proxy-reporting of caries experience in 5-year-old children had very low sensitivity and was lowest in children from the least deprived areas. In contrast, parents/carers who reported their child had caries experience did so reasonably accurately. This study concludes that proxy reporting caries experience is not sufficiently sensitive to replace clinician examination in assessing dental caries experience in surveys of child populations and highlights the importance of data linkage to routine datasets. Keywords: epidemiology, socioeconomic factors, dental caries, self-report, child health, medical record linkage

£10 single article

Other articles in this issue

Article Pages Access
CDH Board September 2024 153-153 Download
Editorial: How to get your work published 154-157 Download
Oral health-related quality of life in the Myanmar population: The first national oral health survey 2016 - 2017 158-163 £10 single article
A Preschool based intervention to reduce Early Childhood Caries in a District of Sri Lanka: A Quasi-experimental Study 164-169 £10 single article
Are ethnic inequalities in adult oral health-related quality of life modified by immigration status? 170-176 £10 single article
Periodontitis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study 177-182 Download
Tobacco smoking and tooth loss in adults and elderly in Brazil: a populational-based cross-sectional study 183-188 £10 single article
The accuracy of parent/carer proxy-reporting of caries experience in children and association with socioeconomic circumstances: a cross-sectional data linkage study 189-194 £10 single article
Is too much sugar bitter? The impacts of sugars on health 195-201 £10 single article
Prevalence of latex allergy in dental professionals - A systematic review and meta-analysis 202-207 £10 single article
Effectiveness of preventive intervention programmes aiming to improve oral health in children who have undergone cariesrelated dental extractions: a rapid review 208-214 £10 single article

Subscribe

Online (Single user only)
£150
Institution Online (IP address validation)
£250

Back issues may be obtained from the publisher

Consider recommending subscription to your institution's library

You can view Open Access papers without a subscription.